Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

APlusPhysics Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
A blog by Guest in General
  • Entries

    4
  • Comments

    3
  • Views

    2,218

About this blog

Entries in this blog

Guest Elliott56

Anti-Gravity

Most of the forces currently known to man have their opposites. Magnetism for example will have a North Pole acting opposite to that of a South Pole. For this reason I began to think of a possible opposite to the force of gravity. Although gravity is not very well understood today, it is widely accepted that mass causes gravity and creates the force that pulls two objects together. This type of force is often modeled as a large mass creating a dip in the fabric of space-time causing other objects to slide in towards it. This can be seen as such:

http://www.ws5.com/spacetime/162571main_GPB_circling_earth3_516.jpg

Keeping these principles in mind I began to think about what sorts of affects antimatter might cause. For example, could antimatter, containing the property opposite to that of mass, have opposite affects on the fabric of space-time, acting as a suction from above creating a hill, pushing other clumps of antimatter away from it. Upon research on the subject I found that antimatter is, contrary to my predictions, often believed to have an attracting force similar to gravity acting between itself and both matter and other antimatter.

Instead, an alternative proposal for an antimatter is known as dark energy. This mysterious force described in the links below has a repelling affect opposite to the attraction created by gravity. This force, strange as it may seem, is actually believed to strengthen as distance between objects increases due to the fact that the farther apart galaxies become, the faster they accelerate away from each other. Although not yet confirmed, this new force seems like it would have little application to the types of anti-gravity we would like to see here on earth for it seems to only have a noticeable affect at great distances. Sorry, no flying hover boards yet...

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/cosmic_darknrg_020115-1.html

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/12/text/

Guest Elliott56

Defying Gravity? Hardly



Based on what we have just learned about torque and rotational motion, should this be possible? I understand the fact that the two objects, equal in weight, would not twist the system around the toothpick, thus maintaining the rotational static equilibrium in this direction, but it is the other direction that astounds me. The fork and spoon are hanging out away from the glass and i would thus expect it necessary for a countering force to be applied on the opposite side of the pivot. When all mass was burned up from the other side i figured the system must fall off of the cup, but instead it remained in equilibrium. I could not think of a reason why this would be, so i decided to set up the experiment myself. I did exactly what was done in the video and found that my forks too stayed up after burning the one end of the toothpick. So what could be the reason why the masses don't tip over? After thinking about it a while longer, i determined that the center of mass of the two forks as one unit lies not anywhere on the forks themselves, but somewhere between the two handles. By adding the toothpick, this location of the center of mass will fall on the toothpick and thus the system itself. As we have learned, an object will be perfectly balanced when held at its center of mass and thus when this point is placed on the cup, there will be no torque in any direction for it is the equivalent of holding a disk at its center, the center of mass.
Guest Elliott56

Zero Gravity Momentum

Currently in AP Physics C, our class is partaking in a unit of independent study for impulse and momentum. Along with the practice multiple choice and short response questions we had been assigned,i decided to used youtube videos to provide a better understanding of the law of conservation of momentum and how this affects real world collisions.

Among many videos of car crashes, billiard shots, and even slaps in the face, this video seemed to be the most unique due to its incorporation of a zero gravity atmosphere. As explained by Richard Garriott in the video, no matter what the collision is between the balls, whether they stick together or not, the net momentum (or mass times velocity) of the system is always conserved.

While searching for this video, i also came upon another one with not as much relevance to momentum and impulse, but providing an interesting topic to think about. If you skip to about halfway through the video, a large sphere of water with an air bubble in it is then injected with droplets of water. Due to surface tension, these droplets then bounce off the walls of water rather than joining to form one mass. Seemed pretty cool to me.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.